For much of July, the FCC seemed to be yet again the center of attention across the telecommunications industry. Early in the month, the Commission released initial post-600MHZ auction reassignments on a website dedicated to the repack process. It had also begun paying broadcasters for giving up spectrum. Additionally, broadcasters that have to repack have asked the FCC for reimbursements for an estimated $2.1B in initial repack costs. The FCC, though, primarily found itself in the spotlight because of the raging net neutrality debate. Many are urging the Commission to reverse the reclassification of broadband Internet as a public utility. On the other hand, small cable companies and new entrants continue to vocalize their support for the removal of net neutrality, arguing the rules restrict their success. Mid-month, there was a “Day of Action to Save Net Neutrality” where thousands of constituents pleaded to Congress to support Net Neutrality, meanwhile, the major networks including Comcast, Verizon, and CenturyLink reemphasized their stance against it, professing a less regulated internet is better for consumers. The FCC is garnering further attention, by the 6-month old administration’s general stance of taking a “weed whacker” to regulation beyond net neutrality. (Read More)
Figuring out 5G seems to be a prominent theme this summer. Network operators and wireless equipment vendors are looking to 5G as a telecommunications panacea. More interesting though is that major integrators like HPE and Dell EMC are developing technologies for the 5G stack to get in on what is speculated to serve as the underlying foundation for newer technologies – think driverless cars and augmented reality. We can speculate all we’d like, but 5G won’t come to fruition for some time. Most slate 2020 to be its true “launch year”, but AT&T just boldly proclaimed their 5G Evolution service. Ericsson put forth a prediction that 15% of the global population will be covered by 5G in 2022. But before anyone can operate in accordance with 5G, the standard has to be finalized. This month, technical and policy experts met at EUCNC 2017 in Finland to discuss outstanding issues and standards prior to its finalization in 2018. In late June, top executives from the four mobile giants had met with President Donald Trump and FCC Chairman Ajit Pai along with other administration officials to garner some executive level support for their rollouts. (Read More)
This month’s wires were dominated by discussions around the adoption and implementation of 5G. Meeting the new wireless standards will support various deliverables for different providers – from the roll out of mobile broadband to the wide-scale facilitation of IoT. There are still many challenges to overcome: deploying standalone 5G networks that are fully independent from 4G architecture, leveraging new higher frequency bands and unlicensed spectrum, and integrating new technologies, such as small cells. One of the key challenges will be determining the transport medium that will allow 5G standards to be met. Some believe that 5G wireless networks will have to rely heavily on fiber backhaul, while others are exploring how millimeter wave (mmWave) could be used in lieu of expensive deployments. There have also been discussions exploring how shared small cells infrastructure used on the 3.5 GHz spectrum could support multiple providers’ 5G ambitions from a single cell simultaneously. Transport mechanisms are not the only technologies in play. Organizations are also experimenting with virtual tools, particularly AI and advanced analytics to expedite 5G adoption. While the industry strives to bring 5G to fruition, advanced LTE networks are expected to offer increasingly ultra-fast speeds on top of which applications could be built and easily transitioned to 5G upon its availability. (Read More)
Now that the FCC’s 600MHZ auction is finally over, it’s becoming clear who the winners are. Surprising many in the industry, AT&T and Verizon’s bidding activity was relatively lackluster, whereas T-Mobile spent $8B on 45% of the total low-band spectrum sold. Dish Network was another triumphant underdog, having purchased significantly more spectrum than towering rival, Comcast. To finalize the process, the FCC appointed 10 staffers to serve as regional coordinators to facilitate the subsequent repack phase which will take place through July 2020. The end of the auction means the FCC’s quiet period has been lifted – we can expect much more speculation around M&A activity in the wireless space now that participants can talk to each other again. (Read More)
At this point it’s clear that IoT’s momentum is unstoppable. Naturally, the market is abuzz with speculation on how this phenomenon will play out. Even though there’s an overwhelming air of excitement surrounding IoT, there are an abundance of very reasonable concerns that include sensor inaccuracy defiling data analysis, users failing to apply security patches and leaving themselves open to attacks, and rapid obsolescence of deployed equipment. Some call for IoT to be regulated by a governing body, not only to protect a more vulnerable edge, but also to foster mindshare between providers to propel its progress. It’s imperative that all standing issues get sorted out, especially in the face of predictions that the processors needed to make a device “smart” will cost as little as ten cents, inciting an explosion of connected products. In fact, the threat to IoT devices has already arrived: AT&T tracked a 400 percent increase in scans of IoT devices during the first half of 2016, showing that hackers are assessing the usefulness of IoT products for their nefarious agendas. (Read More)
It’s finally coming to an end. On March 6th, the FCC is launching the final stage of its 600MHz auction process – the assignment phase, where winning bidders of the forward auction will bid on specific frequencies. This final tranche is scheduled to definitively end on March 30th. A modest $19.63B of proceeds were generated after multiple auction round phases. What Tom Wheeler, the former FCC Chairman, promised would be a “spectrum extravaganza” ended up being more of a subdued spectrum luncheon. Gordon Smith, head of the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) brought attention to the fact that the previous auction, which ended January 2015, raised $40B for just half the spectrum moved in the current auction and derided cries of a spectrum crunch that needed addressing. Explaining the underwhelming results (in the face of initial predictions that ran as high as $80B) is simple: broadcasters showed up and the wireless carriers did not. The former still came away with a nice payday however – Fox Television Stations, for instance, expects to receive $350m for the spectrum it off loaded. It’s far below estimates, but still nothing to scoff at. (Read More)
The post-incentive auction transition schedule depends on avoiding interference, coping with limited tower crew availability and limiting a safety risk that a tight time frame might pose.
Broadcasters have waited patiently to discover if and when the FCC will an- nounce an official scheduling meth- odology for the post-auction repack. However, it is difficult to see how the schedule can meet all of the require- ments listed above while addressing the FCC’s No. 1 priority of avoiding interference between stations (what the FCC refers to as linked-station sets). Timing presents a major chal- lenge as stations prepare to meet un- known repack deadlines and obtain proper reimbursement for their ef- forts. But stations do not control the repack schedule. This control lies en- tirely with the FCC. (Read More)